Pair of Byzantine Gold Perikarpia from Thessaloniki

by ArchaeologyArtByzantine ArtByzantine JewelryByzantiumJewelryMedieval ArtPowerpoints
Pair of Wristbands with Birds and Palmettes, made in Constantinople, 800s–900s. Gold with granulated decoration and enamel, Height 7 cm and Diameter 8.6×6.6 cm, Museum of Byzantine Culture, Thessaloniki, Greece
http://vizantinaistorika.blogspot.com/2014/03/blog-post_19.html

In Byzantine culture, bejewelled perikarpia (wristbands) played a dual role, both as functional accessories and symbols of status and protection. They were often worn by emperors, officials, and high-ranking clergy, and were intricately designed with luxurious materials such as precious metals, silk, gold thread, and precious stones. Their aesthetic value lay in the detailed craftsmanship, often reflecting religious and imperial motifs, serving as a visual display of wealth, piety, and power. Additionally, the ornate patterns and vibrant colours used in perikarpia added to the elegance of Byzantine attire, contributing to the overall grandeur of the empire’s visual culture. Today we will focus on a Pair of Byzantine Gold Perikarpia from Thessaloniki that exhibits exceptional beauty!

By asking questions starting with ‘who,’ ‘why,’ ‘when,’ and ‘where’ about the Byzantine Perikarpia from Thessaloniki at the city’s Museum of Byzantine Culture, we can explore the artworks’ historical context, artistic significance, and the story behind their creation.

Where exactly were the perikarpia found, and what does this location tell us about their significance? The perikarpia were discovered under Dodecanesou Street in Thessaloniki, buried about three feet underground. This area was once a busy urban center in Byzantine times, indicating that the wristbands may have belonged to a wealthy or high-status individual living in the city. The location suggests a strong connection to Thessaloniki’s past as a significant cultural and economic hub of the Byzantine Empire. The hiding of these treasure points to periods of conflict and invasion, particularly during the Saracen attack on the city in 904.

When were they crafted, and how does this fit into Byzantine history? The Byzantine perikarpia were likely crafted during the height of the Byzantine Empire, possibly between the 9th and 10th centuries, based on their artistic style and the period of the Saracen attack on Thessaloniki in 904. This timeframe fits into a period of Byzantine wealth, artistic flourishing, and political challenges, marked by external threats and invasions. The use of gold and enamel on these wristbands reflects the luxurious craftsmanship typical of the empire’s elite, illustrating the fusion of religious symbolism and imperial power in Byzantine art.

Who might have owned or worn these wristbands, and what social or religious role did they play? The perikarpia were likely owned by a wealthy individual or someone of high status, possibly an aristocrat or merchant in Thessaloniki. Given their luxurious design and use of precious materials like gold and enamel, they may have also been worn by someone with religious or imperial connections. In Byzantine society, such items were not only decorative but also served as symbols of wealth, piety, and social rank, possibly even offering spiritual protection. Their burial suggests the owner sought to protect valuable possessions during times of conflict or instability.

Why were they buried twice, and what does their discovery reveal about the history of Thessaloniki during these periods? The perikarpia were buried twice—first during the Saracen attack on Thessaloniki in 904 to protect them from being looted, and then later, possibly in the 1600s, by a wealthy merchant. The double burial reflects the repeated cycles of instability in Thessaloniki’s history, as it faced invasions and upheavals over centuries. Their discovery highlights the city’s historical significance as a center of wealth, commerce, and strategic importance, while also showcasing the lengths individuals went to safeguard valuable possessions during turbulent times.

For a PowerPoint on Byzantine Perikarpia, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: https://media.ems.gr/ekdoseis/makedonika/makedonika_07/ekd_pemk_07_petsas_2.pdf https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/deltion/article/view/4427/4203 σελ 59 Στυλιανός Πελεκανίδης, Τα χρυσά βυζαντινά νομίσματα της Θεσσαλονίκης, Δελτίον XAE 1 (1959), Περίοδος Δ’. Στη μνήμη του ΝίκουΒέη (1883-1958), ΑΘΗΝΑ  1960, Σελ. 55-71, https://www.mbp.gr/sites/default/files/styles/object_images/public/4mikrotexnia.jpg?itok=9xIJgEtP, Dr. Alicia Walker, “Wearable art in Byzantium,” in Smarthistory, July 30, 2021, accessed September 12, 2024, https://smarthistory.org/wearable-art-byzantium/ and https://blogs.getty.edu/iris/uncovering-the-history-of-a-long-buried-byzantine-treasure/

Michael Attaleiates’s Ring at Dumbarton Oaks

by ArtByzantine ArtByzantine JewelryByzantiumJewelryMedieval ArtSocial StudiesStudent ActivitiesWorksheets
Ring of Michael Attaleiates, before 1080, Enamel on Gold, 3 cm, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC, USA http://museum.doaks.org/objects-1/info?query=Portfolios%20%3D%20%222620%22&sort=0&page=10

Michael Attaleiates’s Ring at Dumbarton Oaks has an inscription on its hoop that reads… Bearer of God, help thy servant Michael Attaleiates… while the bezel of the ring displays the bust of the Virgin flanked by the abbreviation ‘Mother of God.’ Byzantine rings with the owner’s name are scarce, and a ring associated with such a distinguished citizen is exceptionally rare. It stands as an extraordinary treasure! http://museum.doaks.org/objects-1/info?query=Portfolios%20%3D%20%222620%22&sort=0&page=10

In confronting this historical artifact, the initial question that arises relates to its owner, Michael Attaleiates. The key questions are: Who was he, and what attributes contributed to his recognition as a significant figure?

Michael Attaleiates was a Byzantine historian and government official who lived in the 11th century. He was likely born in Attaleia and relocated to Constantinople between 1030 and 1040 for legal studies. Upon his ‘graduation’ he entered the empire’s administration serving in the judiciary sector. Recognized for his judicial prowess, he received prestigious honors from the Byzantine Emperors and amassed substantial wealth through services in the empire’s administration.

In 1072, he compiled the Ponema Nomikon, a legal synopsis for Emperor Michael VII, based on the 9th-century Basilika. Around 1079/80, he penned The History, chronicling the Byzantine Empire from 1034 to 1079, showcasing valuable insights into the events and characters of his time, as well as the political, military, and social developments. His writings contribute significantly to our understanding of the political and cultural context of the Byzantine Empire during a critical period of its history. https://alexandria-publ.gr/shop/vios-ke-politia-enos-vizantinou-mandarinou/

Ring of Michael Attaleiates, before 1080, Enamel on Gold, 3 cm, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC, USA https://twitter.com/Varangian_Tagma/status/1598350774496817152/photo/1
Ring of Michael Attaleiates, before 1080, Enamel on Gold, 3 cm, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC, USA http://museum.doaks.org/objects-1/info?query=Portfolios%20%3D%20%222620%22&sort=0&page=10

Back to Attaleiates’s ring, and according to Stephen Zwirn, retired Assistant Curator in the Byzantine Collection of Dumbarton Oaks as of 2012… the ring stands out for deviating from the typical cloisonné technique used in Byzantium, instead adopting the champlevé technique associated with medieval Western European production. This method involves carving a cavity into the background, filling it with enamel, and leaving raised lines to define the image, allowing for intricate details in the drapery folds and inscriptions. The ring is so well crafted, that there is no doubt that this technique had been fully mastered by a Byzantine artist. http://museum.doaks.org/objects-1/info?query=Portfolios%20%3D%20%222620%22&sort=0&page=10

The second inquiry that arises concerns the acquisition history of the ring. According to Dumbarton Oaks records, on the 15th of August – a day Christians commemorate the feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary – the Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection in Washington, DC, acquired Michael Attaleiates’s Ring from the Art Dealer Joseph Brummer. This prompts a dual question: Who was Joseph Brummer, and what distinguishes him as a noteworthy figure in the realm of art dealers?

Henri Rousseau, 1844 – 1910
Portrait of Joseph Brummer, 1909, Oil on Canvas, 115.9 × 88.3 cm, The National Gallery, London, UK https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/henri-rousseau-portrait-of-joseph-brummer

Joseph Brummer was a prominent art dealer in the early to mid-20th century, known for his significant contributions to the art world. Born in 1883 in Hungary, Brummer, along with his brothers, Ernest and Imre, established the Brummer Gallery in Paris in 1905, later moving it to New York in 1914. The Brummer Gallery played a pivotal role in recognizing the artistic importance of Medieval Arts and unusually introducing them as if they were modernist artifacts. The Brummer Gallery was also famous for introducing European modern art to the United States, showcasing works by renowned artists such as Picasso, Modigliani, and Brancusi. Joseph Brummer was renowned for his discerning eye and deep knowledge of art, building a reputation as a tastemaker and a key figure in the art market during his time. His legacy lives on not only through the artworks he handled but also in the influence he had on shaping the appreciation of art in America. https://medievalartus.ace.fordham.edu/exhibits/show/josephbrummer/josephbrummer-essay

P4125 recto: Byzantine ring in heavy, massive gold, with Greek inscription all around and a seal on top, also in gold, with figure in champleve enamel; also inscription around ring, The MET: Thomas J. Watson Library Digital Collections – The Brummer Gallery Records, New York, USA https://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p16028coll9/id/29918/rec/17
P4125 verso: Byzantine ring in heavy, massive gold, with Greek inscription all around and a seal on top, also in gold, with figure in champleve enamel; also inscription around ring, The MET: Thomas J. Watson Library Digital Collections – The Brummer Gallery Records, New York, USA https://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p16028coll9/id/29917/rec/17

On the 15th of August 1947, Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection purchased Attaleiates’s Gold Ring from Joseph Brummer. Searching MET’s Thomas J. Watson Library Digital Collections – The Brummer Gallery Records, I present you with both sides of the Ring’s Inventory Card, Numbered P4125!

For a Student Activity, titled Comparative Analysis of Champlevé and Cloisonné Enamel Techniques in Byzantine Art, please… Check HERE!

Pectoral with Coins and Pseudo-Medallion

by ArtByzantine ArtByzantine JewelryByzantiumEarly Christian ArtJewelryPowerpoints
Pectoral with Coins and Pseudo-Medallion, ca. 539–50, Gold, niello, 23.9 x 21.9 x 1.6 cm, the MET, NY, USA https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/464070

Neck rings, such as the imposing gold Pectoral with Coins and Pseudo-Medallion in the Metropolitan Museum in New York City, are cited in early sources as playing a role both in the glorification of military heroes and in coronation ceremonies. They were popular during the Late Roman period and continued well into the Early Byzantine era. Also known as Byzantine Imperial Collars or Byzantine Imperial Torcs, ornate necklaces like the MET example, were worn by members of the Byzantine imperial family and high-ranking officials during the Byzantine Empire (330-1453 AD). These neck rings were made of gold and decorated with medallions, coins, and intricate designs, often featuring Christian symbols. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/464070

The Metropolitan Museum pectoral necklace is composed of a plain, hollow neck ring attached to a frame set with a large central medallion flanked by coins, and two small decorative disks. The central medallion, encased by beaded wire, presents an unidentified Emperor in military attire on the obverse, and the enthroned personification of Constantinople on the reverse. Fourteen coins of Byzantine Emperors reigning during the fifth to the sixth centuries, are placed symmetrically, left, and right of the central medallion. The coins are surrounded by beaded wire as well. Crosses in niello, an interesting reference to Christianity, decorate the two small disks on either side of the medallion. The space between the coins and the medallion is filled with small rosettes and larger trefoils. The two ribbed rings at the pectoral’s lower edge once held a large medallion of the emperor Theodosius I (in the Collection of the Freer Gallery of Art). https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/464070 and https://www.metmuseum.org/art/metpublications/Age_of_Spirituality_Late_Antique_and_Early_Christian_Art_Third_to_Seventh_Century Age of Spirituality: Late Antique and Early Christian Art, page 318-319

Pectoral with Coins and Pseudo-Medallion (detail), ca. 539–50, Gold, niello, 23.9 x 21.9 x 1.6 cm, the MET, NY, USA https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/464070
Medallion, consisting of a coin of Theodosius I (A.D. 379-395) set in an ornamental frame, 6th century, Gold, Diam: 0.5 cm, Freer Gallery of Art, Washington DC, USA https://archive.asia.si.edu/exhibitions/online/luxuryarts/1d.htm   

This amazing necklace was part of a hoard of thirty-four pieces of gold jewelry said to have been found at the turn of the twentieth century, possibly at ancient Lycopolis (modern Assiut) or Antinoöpolis (modern Sheikh Ibada), both in central Egypt. The circumstances of the hoard’s discovery remain obscure as the treasure was illegally excavated. The high quality of each piece links the treasure jewels to the imperial workshops in Constantinople. The hoard is now divided among the Metropolitan Museum; the British Museum, London; the Freer Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.; and the Staatliche Museen-Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Berlin. Whether the pieces were indeed discovered together or were assembled from different sites, they represent the standard of luxury among the elite in Egypt under Byzantine rule and attest to the close connection between the wealthy province and the capital Constantinople. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/metpublications/The_Arts_of_Byzantium_The_Metropolitan_Museum_of_Art_Bulletin_v_58_no_4_Spring_2001 “The Arts of Byzantium”: The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v. 58, no. 4 (Spring, 2001), Page 19 and “Into the hands of a well-known antiquary of Cairo”: The Assiut Treasure and the Making of an Archaeological Hoard by Elizabeth Dospěl Williams, West 86th: A Journal of Decorative Arts, Design History, and Material Culture, Vol. 21, No. 2 (Fall-Winter 2014), pp. 251-272 https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/679985?read-now=1#page_scan_tab_contents

The Byzantine Imperial Neck Rings were not just a fashion accessory, they were a symbol of power and authority. The imperial family, for example, wore them on important occasions, such as coronations, to demonstrate their wealth and status. Members of the Byzantine military elite, on the other hand, wore them as trophies of their military distinction. According to Procopius, soldiers were rewarded with money, and honoured with precious necklaces or bracelets. It is interesting to note that during the Early Byzantine period, men and women wore such necklaces alike. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/metpublications/Age_of_Spirituality_Late_Antique_and_Early_Christian_Art_Third_to_Seventh_Century Age of Spirituality: Late Antique and Early Christian Art, Third to Seventh Century, edited by Kurt Weitzmann, 1979, page 318-319

For a PowerPoint on the so-called Assiut Treasure, please… Check HERE!

Pendant with the Bust of an Empress

by ArtByzantine ArtByzantine JewelryByzantiumEarly Christian ArtJewelryStudent ActivitiesWorksheets
Chain and Pendant with the Bust of an Empress, 379–395 AD, Gold, garnet, sapphire, glass, 6.4 cm, The J. Paul Getty Museum, CA, USA http://colorsandstones.eu/2020/11/08/necklace-with-a-pendant-roman-overview/

St. Ambrose describes her, Aelia Flacilla, wife of emperor Theodosius I, as “a soul true to God” (Fidelis anima Deo. – “De obitu Theodosii”, n. 40, in P. L., XVI, 1462). In his panegyric, St. Gregory of Nyssa bestowed the highest praise on her virtuous life and pictured her as the helpmate of the emperor in all good works, an ornament of the empire, a leader of justice, an image of beneficence. He praises her as filled with zeal for the Faith, as a pillar of the Church, and as a mother of the indigent. Theodoret in particular exalts her charity and benevolence (Hist. Eccles., V, xix, ed. Valesius, III, 192 sq.). He tells us how she personally tended cripples and quotes a saying of hers: “To distribute money belongs to the imperial dignity, but I offer up for the imperial dignity itself personal service to the Giver.” Could the Pendant with the Bust of an Empress in the Getty Collection depict this extraordinary Early Christian Empress? https://www.ecatholic2000.com/cathopedia/vol6/volsix114.shtml

Let’s answer some questions.

When did the Getty Museum acquire the Pendant with the Bust of an Empress? Yes, we do… Barbara Deppert-Lippitz, a most reputable expert archaeologist in ancient gold, contributed an article, titled A Group o f Late Antique Jewelry in the Getty Museum (pages 107-140) in Studia Varia from the J. Paul Getty Museum: Volume 1 (OPA 8), 1993. Let me quote… The majority of Late Roman and Early Byzantine jewelry that we do have has no known provenance and is undated. Our knowledge of jewelry of the period is based mainly on a few larger hoards with recorded find spots but without any external evidence for dating. It is therefore fortunate that in 1983 the Getty Museum was able to acquire a group of fifteen pieces of jewelry buried around A.D . 400. https://www.getty.edu/publications/virtuallibrary/0892362030.html page 107

Where were the Late Antique pieces of jewelry, including the Pendant with Empress, found? We do not exactly know… but according to Barbara Deppert-Lippitz… As all pieces had a similar patina, it need not be doubted that the group was, indeed, found together. They are all in very good condition, except for missing pearls on some items. Nothing is known about the previous history of this hoard, but no treasure corresponding to the present one is recorded as having been excavated anywhere during this century There are, however, certain indications that the hoard must have come from the eastern part of the Roman Empire. Further interesting observations point out that… The Getty hoard belongs among the well-known treasures from the Hill of Saint Louis in Carthage, Tunisia, and from Ténès in Algeria, both now generally agreed to belong to the period around A.D . 400, and the one from Thetford at Gallows Hill, near Thetfordin Norfolk, dated to the late fourth century A.D. All these hoards are dated on a purely stylistic basis, with no external evidence. https://www.getty.edu/publications/virtuallibrary/0892362030.html page 107, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carthage_Treasure and https://www.persee.fr/doc/rbph_0035-0818_1960_num_38_1_2309_t1_0098_0000_2 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thetford_Hoard

How did the Getty Museum acquire the Late Antique pieces of Jewelry? In 1983, the J. Paul Getty Museum purchased the group of fifteen pieces of Late Antique pieces of jewelry from the Company of “Robin Symes, Limited,” founded in 1977 and dissolved in 2005. https://www.getty.edu/art/collection/object/103VE6#full-artwork-details

Chain and Pendant with the Bust of an Empress, 379–395 AD, Gold, garnet, sapphire, glass, 6.4 cm, The J. Paul Getty Museum, CA, USA http://colorsandstones.eu/2020/11/08/necklace-with-a-pendant-roman-overview/

How can you describe the Pendant with the Bust of an Empress? This is actually a necklace consisting of a chain and a circular medallion. The gold ropelike multiple loop-in-loop chain shows remarkable workmanship. It ends with a hook-and-eye clasp, decorated with openwork circlets as well as filigree and granulation. The medallion-shaped pendant displays a frontal female bust flanked by two Victory Goddesses holding wreaths. A circular outer band, with inset garnets, and blue and green glass beads, serving as a frame to the repoussé medallion, was a rather primitive later addition to the original jewel. Three chain pendants and two strong rings attached to either side of the medallion were also added later. Today, only one pendant chain remains attached to the outer frame, holds an emerald, and terminates in a decorative scroll ornament. https://www.getty.edu/publications/virtuallibrary/0892362030.html pages 109-111.

Chain and Pendant with the Bust of an Empress (Detail), 379–395 AD, Gold, garnet, sapphire, glass, 6.4 cm, The J. Paul Getty Museum, CA, USA
http://colorsandstones.eu/2020/11/08/necklace-with-a-pendant-roman-overview/
 

Who is the depicted woman? It most probably is Aelia Flacilla, the first wife of Emperor Theodosius I. According to Barbara Deppert-Lippitz… a small but significant detail, the diadem, the Empress wears, offers valuable information. Based on numismatic evidence, similar diadems have been worn only by the empresses Aelia Flacilla, wife of Theodosius I, whose coinage commenced in A.D . 383 and who died in 386, and by her daughter-in-law Eudoxia, wife of Arcadius (A.D . 383-408). This narrows the chronological range of the medallion pendant to the last two decades of the fourth century A.D. The differences between the coin portraits of Flacilla and of Eudoxia are marginal. However, the oval face with a short straight nose, small mouth with thick lips, and energetic chin seem to be closer to the portrait on certain issues of Flacilla than to that of Eudoxia. https://www.getty.edu/publications/virtuallibrary/0892362030.html page 110

For a Student Activity, please… Check HERE!